Mapping Resources: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''>>>[[Wiki_tutorial|basic editing tutorial]] | '''>>>[[Wiki_tutorial|basic editing tutorial]] | ||
== 'CO-MAPPING' - | == 'CO-MAPPING' == - | ||
The method is based on co-design of solutions as to address territorial and landscape questions in two steps: | The method is based on co-design of solutions as to address territorial and landscape questions in two steps: | ||
1. walking on site and mapping main criticalities and resources on a shared platform; | 1. walking on site and mapping main criticalities and resources on a shared platform; |
Revision as of 23:46, 1 March 2022
>>>back to methods overview
== 'CO-MAPPING' == - The method is based on co-design of solutions as to address territorial and landscape questions in two steps: 1. walking on site and mapping main criticalities and resources on a shared platform; 2. discussion with the participants and elaboration of shared solutions based on the evidence of step 1. The main tool for this method is “Google my maps”, an easy-to-use platform to map various types of information, both on site with mobile phones and remotely. The aim is to geolocalise information intuitively and, at the same time, to structure it according to thematic layers. The living lab participants can share the results of their exploration walk and open a common space to elaborate planning/design solutions.
What are the goals of this method?
The shared platform is built on the descriptions of mapped resources such as photos, sketches, texts, interviews, questionnaires, etc., collected during the “exploration walk”. Therefore, it is a valuable means to discuss and elaborate solutions in a large participatory context. Moreover, the tool “Google my maps” requires only a Google account, it is free and easy to use. Non-experts can insert in map many elements, for instance photos, videos, and further sources whilst walking in the site trip, simply using their mobile phones.
What are typical questions this method is able to answer?
Which and where are located the main resources of the study areas? Which are the visible problems of the study areas, according to the involved stakeholders? Can you localise resources and key points along the walk? Can the participants analyse and discuss the observations collected by other stakeholders of the Living Lab?
In which situations can this method be applied?
- Give a few examples of typical settings/processes in which this method suits well
- Who is typically involved?
How does this method work in practice?
- Describe the application as practical as possible
- How much time is needed for each step?
- Which materials/rooms/technical equipment is needed?
- What are the tasks of the facilitators?
- What should be avoided?
Examples of typical results
- If you have already applied the method in the past or have access to results from other processes, please show a few examples of how the method works and of its results
What are typical next steps after applying this method?
- Give an outlook of how to follow-up: How should the results be processed and used in the further process?
Any limitations and typical pitfalls?
- Reflect a bit on what the methods can not do and what the process designer should be aware of, which additional activities are needed
- Any ethical concerns as we are working with people? Add a few reflections
Worksheets and Materials
- If you have or know any practical worksheets or templates, please add them here for download
- If these come from other websites, please link directly to those and add the authors you are referring to here
Further readings, links and references
- Add scientific articles, weblinks and other relevant resources